Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tripod vs. Angelfire!
Started by Panda, Dec 29 2003 09:17 PM
16 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 29 December 2003 - 09:56 PM
wtf!?!?!?
they both suck
they both suck
#3
Posted 29 December 2003 - 10:00 PM
Angelfire
Both have 20 megs, but angelfire is more leaniant. I hot link from angelfire all the time and my account has not been suspended yet. Tripod doesnt allow hot linking but it offers free layouts that you can use and a better site maker than angelfire...
Both have 20 megs, but angelfire is more leaniant. I hot link from angelfire all the time and my account has not been suspended yet. Tripod doesnt allow hot linking but it offers free layouts that you can use and a better site maker than angelfire...

::DeviantArt ~ Shallow Bay - Personal Blog ::
Graphic Designer, Artist, Dreamer...
#5
Posted 29 December 2003 - 11:20 PM
wtf they all su*ks the one who create the page is a lousy fool...
#6
Posted 29 December 2003 - 11:44 PM
QUOTE(pure evil @ Dec 30 2003, 04:23 AM)
i like tripod better easy to use heck my little brother could make a ok lookin sight there
Well, I took a look at your site and its too simple. Actually, I think tripod has that layout up for grabs no?
Well, anyone can make a good looking site with angelfire...I have one myself, but I wont release it however. I think its too crappy...

::DeviantArt ~ Shallow Bay - Personal Blog ::
Graphic Designer, Artist, Dreamer...
#7
Posted 30 December 2003 - 01:56 AM
they both suck
too many restrictions.
too many restrictions.
#9
Posted 30 December 2003 - 05:30 PM
QUOTE(Shinosk @ Dec 30 2003, 04:00 AM)
Angelfire
Both have 20 megs, but angelfire is more leaniant. I hot link from angelfire all the time and my account has not been suspended yet. Tripod doesnt allow hot linking but it offers free layouts that you can use and a better site maker than angelfire...
Both have 20 megs, but angelfire is more leaniant. I hot link from angelfire all the time and my account has not been suspended yet. Tripod doesnt allow hot linking but it offers free layouts that you can use and a better site maker than angelfire...
It's 35mb of spaces
#10
Posted 30 December 2003 - 06:19 PM
I don't like both of the compaines. There server is so slow. If you want fast download, use another host.
#13
Posted 31 December 2003 - 08:10 AM
WTF?!
I use neither
I use neither
#14
Posted 31 December 2003 - 08:12 AM
Yep. Both of the companies are really bad. Try another host if you want to design a website or store something.
#15
Posted 31 December 2003 - 08:50 AM
Try 1and1.com or tripod.co.uk
Try hostultra.com if u don't need sql.
Try hostultra.com if u don't need sql.
#17
Posted 05 January 2004 - 06:03 PM
anglefire was better. but they both suck.
#18
Posted 05 January 2004 - 07:28 PM
AF
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















